CASE STUDY:

GOOGLE TRIPS COLLABORATIVE FEATURE ADDITION

 
Google Trips Screens Perspective 161218.jpg
 

 

THE BRIEF

Since its launch in 2016, Google Trips has been gaining steady popularity as a travel planning tool for mobile. Parsing travel information in your Gmail inbox to plan individual trips within the app along with Google’s own crowdsourced travel reviews and information, it's a powerful tool to have on location wherever you are. With the added convenience of Google Maps, users can pin spots to the map and the app will fill in the day’s itinerary.

The app is still limited, however, with the capability to share Trips with others made available just recently in 2017, but no way to collaborate on planning a trip with friends.

Other users of the Google Trips app are able to see trips shared with them, but not edit. Adding this ability to plan a trip with multiple people and providing the tools to communicate with each other within the app--as well as a desktop extension that syncs to the mobile app since people generally book items on a desktop device--would give Google Trips the boost they need to gain the upper hand in the travel app market.

 

 

THE PROCESS

Research:

Secondary and primary research like market research, competitive analysis, interviews, persona creation, as well as storyboarding.

UX Strategy and Development: 

Using the pains and goals of our persona, sketches, and a site map were developed

Interaction Design: 

User flow with initial wireframes help to capture the possible direction for the mobile app

 

UI Design: 

With Google's current UI and functionality in mind, wireframes were generated

Prototyping & Testing: 

User testing of a high fidelity prototype of the mobile app paired with desktop extension followed by an affinity map.

 
 
White Back Border.jpg

RESEARCH

Market Research, Competitive Analysis, User Interviews, Persona Development, Storyboarding

 
 

RESEARCH GOALS

What are Google Trip's secondary competitors?

How do people use their mobile travel apps? Do they need a collaborative feature?

What are other methods with which people plan group trips?

Do people mainly do their booking on laptops or with their mobile devices?

What features would be needed to plan a group trip effectively?

 
 

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

The comparison of a few of the most well known travel apps were done, as well as the identification of other planning methods

 
STRENGTHS:Collaborative feature already for groups, countdown clock for flights, parses emails for trip and travel infoWEAKNESSES:Need to pay $49/year to unlock sharing itinerary, free version has moving ads, doesn't display airline terminal info

STRENGTHS:

Collaborative feature already for groups, countdown clock for flights, parses emails for trip and travel info

WEAKNESSES:

Need to pay $49/year to unlock sharing itinerary, free version has moving ads, doesn't display airline terminal info

STRENGTHS:The most reviews for items of all travel apps, ability to plan trip out with a day-by-day itinerary, can add accommodations to day's planWEAKNESSES:Lots of sponsored content, doesn't collect information to create custom trip recommendations

STRENGTHS:

The most reviews for items of all travel apps, ability to plan trip out with a day-by-day itinerary, can add accommodations to day's plan

WEAKNESSES:

Lots of sponsored content, doesn't collect information to create custom trip recommendations

STRENGTHS:Includes ability to purchase, book, and save transportation, accommodations, as well as flights, deals, and alerts associated with bookings, can share itineraryWEAKNESSES:No map abilities, no collaborative feature, not great with single bo…

STRENGTHS:

Includes ability to purchase, book, and save transportation, accommodations, as well as flights, deals, and alerts associated with bookings, can share itinerary

WEAKNESSES:

No map abilities, no collaborative feature, not great with single bookings

STRENGTHS:Ability to converse with accommodation owners, overview of pricing on a map, can invite friends to add to tripsWEAKNESSES:Not ideal for complete trip planning, exclusively for accommodations and attractions

STRENGTHS:

Ability to converse with accommodation owners, overview of pricing on a map, can invite friends to add to trips

WEAKNESSES:

Not ideal for complete trip planning, exclusively for accommodations and attractions

 

 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:  

In addition to these apps, many people like to arrange travel with friends via shared spreadsheets like Google Docs as well as group chats and group pages on social media like Facebook. Incorporating at least a few of their most common features into Google Trips would be especially useful.

 

 

1:1 INTERVIEWS:

Examining the goals and pains of potential Google Trips users, variables were mapped and interviewees with the most in common were identified.


 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:  

5 participants aged 27-42 were interviewed. Interesting findings were that the more experienced the traveler, the less willing they were to compromise on their trip details.

 

 

INTRODUCING ALEX

The Tech Savvy Vacation Planner formed from Sujed & Stefan's shared variables since they had the most in common

STORYBOARDING

Planning a group trip among friends

 

 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:

Collaboration is most definitely a necessary feature for every travel app, as competitive analysis and interview results show. Most interviewees expressed that they already use a collaborative travel app like TripIt or spreadsheets that were shared on top of emails and chat groups. Desktop computers were preferred for research and booking so I had to either add a feature to Google's current Travel Guide functionality in their search engine results or design a desktop extension to pair with Google Trips on mobile. I did the latter since it incorporates the communication aspects of the feature addition like commenting and liking without changing the browsing experience and users can collapse the extension window to close that feature if desired.

 

 
White Back Border.jpg

UX Strategy & dev

Site Map

 

GOALS / PAIN POINTS • SOLUTIONS

Efficiency Group communication within app for quicker decision making

Control Ability to comment and like to express opinions and vote

Convenience Ability to add attractions to mobile app from a desktop device

Intuitiveness Google Material Design utilized for familiarity

 

SITE MAP

This is Google's current Google Trips site map, with the two new page additions of Invite Friends and Share With Friends, as well as all pages with new collaborative features like commenting, liking, and other compatible changes in purple.

White Back Border.jpg

Interaction design

User Flow, Low Fidelity Wireframes

 

USER FLOW MOBILE

User flow of the Invite Friends feature when inviting friends using emails to collaborate with the trip on an iphone.

 
 

USER FLOW DESKTOP EXTENSION

With a click of the extension icon in the browser circled in orange for this flow, users can add items to their synced trip Saved Places window by saving it or favoriting it from the dropdown currently available on Google Travel Guide. Users can also comment and like items as well as share the trip with friends from their laptop. In this flow, the user adds the Old Cathedral of Coimbra to Saved Places. Active areas in prototype circled in orange.

 
White Back Border.jpg

UI Design

Matching Google’s Current UI

 

GOOGLE TRIPS MOBILE APP

The UI for the new Invite Friends page as well as Share Trip page along with what commenting and liking an item would look like.

 

GOOGLE TRIPS DESKTOP EXTENSION

What the UI for the extension's window would look like along with the Invite Friends feature. Users can swipe right and left over the window to access the different cities saved in Saved Places. Additionally, hovering over the Favorite icon allows users to see who added the item.

White Back Border.jpg

Prototyping And Testing

Prototypes were developed with Invision

 

USER TESTING:

Five participants were chosen between the ages of 25-42 to test first the mobile app, then the desktop extension prototypes


 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: 

I learned I needed to announce which operating system the prototype was for when testing, especially on mobile, as symbols like the share icon can differ greatly. I also realized I needed to make active areas on the prototype a little bigger on the mobile prototype because fingers. All users were successful in completing tasks.

 

 

IN CONCLUSION:

All users tested in person with the exception of one and video recordings were made of 4/5 testers. All expressed that they did not know Google Trips and Google Travel Guide existed. Tasks were completed pretty quickly and users understood the significance of the pairing of desktop extension to mobile. Unlike Tripadvisor and other similar travel sites which have its items consolidated in a website, Google's items are results, making it essential to separate the items from all personalization and communication within the search engine. Users all agreed upon discussing this project after testing that Google would indeed have a significantly more powerful product if it allowed for collaboration since all had Gmail email addresses and used Google as their first step to travel research.

 

THE UPDATE:

Changes based on the above findings were made to the prototypes including cleaning up the extensions area of the desktop extension prototype to contain only the Google Trips icon as well as adding an extra screen to the mobile app that indicates that there is a desktop extension users should download to pair with their mobile app. 

 

Prague Group Hero 2 BW Crop.jpg